Tpo 20
The main idea of both the lecture and the talk is about whether the "let it burn" policy is proper or not. Considering this, the author offers three issues against "let it burn" policy. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just argued. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the points in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that Yellowston fires led to deterioration of trees and vegetation in the park's trees. As stated by the professor, Yellowston fires gives certain small plants a chance to grow in the area. For example, some plant's seeds which need high heat in order to germinate grow in the area. So, it is not true that Yellowston fires has devastated the area. Rather, the area is colonized by new plants, which has increased in turn plant diversity in the area.
Moreover, unlike the reading which claims that Yellowston fires devastated animals' habitat, the professor illustrates that the new small plants have created a new habitat for animals such as hares and rabbits, which led to attract more predators to the area. Therefore, the fire has created a stronger habitat for animals compared to before.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the fires damaged tourist industry in the area, saying that fires happen rarely, and they need combination of great deal of factors in order to be occurred in a vast manner.
All in all, the professor maintains that all the options against "let it burn" policy in the reading is not convincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to have specialize in one specific subject 86
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 85
- TPO 27 70
- tpo 41 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to reject the points in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'happen'.
Suggestion: rarely happen
...industry in the area, saying that fires happen rarely, and they need combination of great dea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a vast manner" with adverb for "vast"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...deal of factors in order to be occurred in a vast manner. All in all, the professor maintains ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260450160772 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.167202572347 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0610932475884 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0450160771704 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016077170418 0.0277247811725 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128617363344 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0418006430868 0.0370669169778 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51089241952 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0289389067524 0.0208969081088 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.144694533762 0.128158765124 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016077170418 0.0114777025283 140% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1653.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88256227758 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345195729537 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274021352313 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.138790035587 0.187439937562 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103202846975 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51089241952 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519572953737 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 51.3221887856 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6153846154 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7157963303 49.3711431718 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 49.0175198467 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.88732394366 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.654176244232 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.169706963442 0.142949733639 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0802638530497 0.0787303798458 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.718498958424 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166874200463 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.33736056499 0.266732575781 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110378376446 0.103435571967 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.364491595131 0.414875509568 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0882728044707 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.458012859567 0.40443939384 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092694099369 0.0528353158467 175% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.