TPO 31
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about whether the Sinosauropteryx was a feather dinosaur or not. Considering this, the author offers three arguments to indicate that the Sinosauropteryx was not a feather dinosaur. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the way the reading just discussed. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the options in the passage.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that the fine lines were formed after the animal's death. As stated by the professor, it is unlikely true that the fine lines were formed due to decomposition, since other fossil found in the same site and the same situation did not contain these fine lines. In addition, burying in volcanic ash, helps to preserve animals' structures better.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that the fine lines are the remains of frills rather than those of feathers, the lecturer illustrates that feathers contain a chemical substance, which name elude me at the moment, and this substance is not found in the frills. The substance was found in the fossil. So, it is a fallacious conclusion to consider lines as evidence of frills.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the reading which says that feathers are often served as a method to help animals fly or a way to regulate animals' body the tempretaure; however, the lines structures were found on the backbone and the tail of the animal. Therefore, the fine lines could not be feathers, saying that apart farm regulating animal’s body internal temprature and flying, feathers have other functions. For instance, there some types of birds, which have colorful feathers on their tails in order to attract mates. Given the fact that there were found some colorful things in the fossil of Sinosauropteryx, those animals should utilize their feathers to display.
All in all, the professor maintains that there are strong evidences which suggest that the Sinosauropteryx was a feather dinosaur, the arguments in the reading are not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to reject the options in the passage. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...at the fine lines were formed after the animals death. As stated by the professor, it i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to preserve animals structures better. Moreover, unlike the passage which claim...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255050505051 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.161616161616 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0606060606061 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0479797979798 0.0435111971325 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0126262626263 0.0277247811725 46% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116161616162 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0378787878788 0.0370669169778 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77316420274 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252525252525 0.0208969081088 121% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.159090909091 0.128158765124 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00505050505051 0.0158828679856 32% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151515151515 0.0114777025283 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2164.0 1645.83664459 131% => OK
No of words: 353.0 271.125827815 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13031161473 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365439093484 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297450424929 0.287516216867 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186968838527 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118980169972 0.113142543107 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77316420274 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507082152975 0.539623497131 94% => OK
Word variations: 53.5590477781 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5333333333 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.493816502 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.266666667 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 53.2783758263 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.84090909091 1.90840788429 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.781739318097 0.549887131256 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.186604225016 0.142949733639 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114507051837 0.0787303798458 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.660962980702 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.210933661105 0.139662658121 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.389143202276 0.266732575781 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156796586977 0.103435571967 152% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.493362063947 0.414875509568 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0676699462927 0.0530846634433 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.581793120167 0.40443939384 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822976480772 0.0528353158467 156% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.