TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama
The reading claims that some critics disagree with "let it burn'' policy. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. However, the professor believes that '' let it burn'' is creative, even it has some negative consequences and refutes each of the author's stand-points.
First, the reading avers from significant damage on vegetation and trees which is caused by fire and provides an example of Yellowstone fire to illustrates that. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this concept by stating positive fire impacts on the diversity of new plants. In addition, she states that fires could be created by improving a remarkable opportunity for small plants to grow up and becoming widespread.
Furthermore, the reading posits that animals could die as a direct and indirect consequence of fires and mentioned food chains as an essential role in thriving nature. On the other hand, the professor brings up the fact that a new opportunity will achieve by growing small plants. In fact, small animals like, rabbit, and muse will increase after the fire, since more foods become available. also, she states that certain food chains will gain more power and strangeness.
Finally, the article asserts tourist attraction could decrease by disappearing trees and jungle in fires. In contrary, the professor casts doubt on this claim by stating that it will occur if fire burn happens every year. she implies that fires are rare in time; hence, the tourist attraction doesn't decrease. cause of the fire is massive for the people and not only visitor come in fire year, but also they will come each of years after burns too.
- TPO46 independentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support y 3
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-17:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- tpo51 3
- TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns. However, the professor believes that let it burn is creative, even it has som...
^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ire, since more foods become available. also, she states that certain food chains wi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... occur if fire burn happens every year. she implies that fires are rare in time; he...
^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in time; hence, the tourist attraction doesnt decrease. cause of the fire is massive ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cause
...the tourist attraction doesnt decrease. cause of the fire is massive for the people a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15355805243 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63949035627 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4118834185 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245058479612 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835349868525 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530016229219 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145799635829 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401930362317 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.