The author describes that planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits and she brings three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor explains that although genetic modification provides some benefits, they are not as great as the author's arguments. She refutes each of the author's points on the rational grounds.
First of all, the writer states that genetically modified trees are designed to be harder than natural trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. Nevertheless, the professor posits that some natural trees can resist harsh condition which ensure the survival of these trees. In fact, unmodified trees are genetically diverse and even if some unfavorable conditions happen, such as poor climate condition, insects and pests, some of them can resist this situation. To be more specific, even though most of them will die, the remain trees will ensure the survival of their diversity. She adds that much of the modified trees are uniform and if unexpected condition happens, such as climate change and appearing new pests, they will likely to be wiped out.
Second, according to the reading, genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. Conversely, the speaker brings up the idea that there are hidden costs associated with the genetically modified trees. As a matter of fact, farmers should pay more charge for the seeds than the natural trees; moreover, they should pay the company every time they plant the genetically modified trees.
Third, the writer expresses that the utilize of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. However, the speaker points out that using genetically modified trees cause more damage to nature. To clarify, planting genetically modified trees grow more aggressively than natural trees. Since they grow among the natural trees, they should compete for soil, water and other resources which adversely affect the growth of natural trees. In addition, genetically modified trees lead to crowding out the natural trees.
- TPO 2 3
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 90
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 78
- If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend which of the following will you choose Why 1 Find a roommate to share a room 2 Do not buy the latest mobile phone Buy new technological devices less frequently 3 Buy cheap foods and 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 560, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fic, even though most of them will die, the remain trees will ensure the survival of their...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rees. Third, the writer expresses that the utilize of genetically modified trees can preve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31671554252 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6125625537 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486803519062 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8838685987 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558076576004 0.272083759551 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217201465856 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114238335957 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353851883675 0.162205337803 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963466021739 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.