tpo 23
The marterial discusses the reasons that might cause yellow cedar trees declining. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlines in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely yelow cedar trees declined because of cedar bark beetle. Next, bears might damage cedar trees. Finally, trees might be declined due to climate changes.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one sepcific contradiction is healthy cerdar is much more resistant to beetle, because bark usualy produces powerful chemical which is poison to beetle; furthermore, beetle attacks trees wich were already damage or sick. Inaddition to that, yellow cedar trees was damages insland where there were no bears, so declining happened with and without bears , that mean bears were not the reason. One final point, cedar trees declined in the lower elevations where it is warmer than declining fron the higher elevations where it is colder. If freezing was the reason, declining should happen more in the higher elevation. Consequently, there was not what killed them.
In sumary, there are descripances in the presented information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlines in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t be declined due to climate changes. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eclining happened with and without bears , that mean bears were not the reason. On...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly, there was not what killed them. In sumary, there are descripances in the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57585317687 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639784946237 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.3165211404 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281154966941 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106683527896 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710576085868 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147811785615 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103155263597 0.0443174109184 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.