TPO 25

Essay topics:

TPO 25

In this set of materials, both the article and lecturer discuss the stuff which have been excavated in Iraq. The text firmly states that it is not probable the vessels were used as electric batteries, However, the professor repudiates what have stated in the reading.

Firstly, the lecturer asserts the vessels have discovered by local people, So, it is likely that they have not known the importance of electricity conductors and discarded them. In the conterary, the essay alleges there is no evidence of metal wires near the vessels. So, it is unlikely that this vessels would be used as electric batteries.

Moreover, the professor avers it is true that the copper cylinders inside the jarslook similar to copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia, but it is not proving any thing. Besides, these cylinders may designed fo some purpose but their usage have been changed over the time. So, They may have been used by liquid in a peace of time to produce electricity. On the other hand, the text contends that since the cylinders found with the jars have the same shape with the copper cylinders in the Seleucia, it is highly probable that they have had the same application in the past.

Finaly, the lecturer declares that the ancient people may uses these batteries as an invisible power or magical power. Besides, they may used this power stimulate mussles for traeting the pain in them. Conversely, the text claims that ancient people have nothing to do with electricity. So, the batteries would have been completely useless to them.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-04 Apolytos 70 view
2021-07-30 mahi22 80 view
2021-06-27 mahi22 70 view
2021-06-23 naziii 70 view
2021-03-01 alibenvari 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ar the vessels. So, it is unlikely that this vessels would be used as electric batte...
^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...uins of Seleucia, but it is not proving any thing. Besides, these cylinders may designed ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, so, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97709923664 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50175627372 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0423875959 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473752149975 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154489426303 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592455467275 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260079630402 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460662467098 0.0443174109184 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.