TPO 25- integrated
Based on the given set of reading material, it is the aithor's belief that it's not likely that the vessels, which had been discovered in Iraq, were used as electric batteries in ancient times. and he provided three reasons to substanciate this claim. That being said, the lecturer holds an opposing view and gives several reasons for it that are as follows:
Initially, the writer drew attention to the fact that the vessels were not attached to some conductors such as metal wires. However, the lecturer is quite doubtful about the validity of this idea. As she poits out that the discoverers of these vessels were not archaeologists and were not trained for this job. So the metal wires or some kind of other conductors could have been located in the area but the excavators could have miss the material.
Another point that was raised in the reading was that the cylinders inside the jars look exactly like the ones discoverd in Seleucia, which were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts. So probably the jars were used for holding scrolls as well. Conversely, the lecturer rejects this one too by asserting that there is no evidence for author's claim. These jars could have been used for the same purpose but then some ancient inventor discovered another usage for them by adding some liquid to the vessels, which contained the copper cylinder and the iron rod.
As the last point to support the given claim in the reading, the author put emphasis on the point that these ancient people didn't need batteries because they didn't had any devise for using them. Yet again, the lecturer deems this idea invalid as well. She continues by stating that there is as possibility that they used these batteries for medical purposes. She illustrates that they could also use them for convincing others that they have some kind of magical powers by the sensation of shocking that the batteries could emerge.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views. 90
- TPO 21- integrated 76
- your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors(fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is better choice, and why?1. A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner(so 70
- Do you aGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT?Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost. 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Based on the given set of reading material, it is the aithors beli...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...as electric batteries in ancient times. and he provided three reasons to substancia...
^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which contained the copper cylinder and the iron rod. As the last point to sup...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... on the point that these ancient people didnt need batteries because they didnt had a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...eople didnt need batteries because they didnt had any devise for using them. Yet agai...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, look, so, then, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82262996942 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31302257084 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7377346304 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447897187016 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143786312347 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094487779722 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255197207297 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770550601877 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.