TPO 25 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the vessel is discovered, unlikely to produce electricity when filled with liquids in 2200 yeard old. The author listed three factors to support this issue. However, the lecture described the reasons unconvincing and presented some evidence to refutes all the reasons that are mentioned by the author.
First, the reading passage proposes that because it does not attach to the electrical conductors, it could not produce electricity. On the other hand, the speaker asserts that the vessels are discovered by local people, not archeologists. Thus, this might be found uninteresting beyond the other materials that are thrown away, so she dismissed this reason.
Furthermore, the author points out that the copper cylinder inside it is similar to the copper cylinder which is found in the ruins. On the contrary, the speaker declares it is possible that it originates from that but it shows, the copper cylinder is adopted for other purposes by the time. This idea, consequently, is rebutted by the lecturer.
Last but not least, the author mentioned that there were no devices at that time to need electricity and it was useless. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that it could be used for healing, indeed to stimulate the muscles. Due to the fact that the doctors had the battery for the same purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, so, thus, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65651400649 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568888888889 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.198895564 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234964579921 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740187404745 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515756220324 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12780444728 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300400960674 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.