tpo 26

Essay topics:

tpo 26

The lecture and the reading passage both discuss the spreading of the Zebra mussel from the Eastern Europe that its original habitats to parts of North America. On the one hand, the reading clearly state that the mussel spreading cannot be stopped, and cause a serious threat to freshwater fishes. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying that the arguments were questionable and implausible, and the spreading of mussel under control.

To begin with, the reading state that the strong suggestion it was the mussel can attach with the ship's bottom, and it was called ballast water so by movement of the ships the spreading of these animals increased. However, the lecture refutes that they could not control because they did not have enough knowledge. The professor provide an example that spreading the mussel to North America was not true because they did not empty the water in there water.

Secondly, the reading makes arguments is that the mussel had a high reproduction rate, and there was not predators. Conversely, the lecture argues this point by saying that in the beginning it was not predators, but after that the birds started ate the mussels.

Lastly, the reading state that because the mussel became dominant they compete for food with other freshwater fishes. The lecture counter this claims by pointing out that it was a negative impact on fishes, but the positive one the mussels generate food that help the fishes.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-05 Apolytos 85 view
2023-03-02 zaid 70 view
2021-09-04 DarkSaitama 60 view
2021-02-12 Pooja dave 80 view
2020-12-26 marathon24h 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user majduleen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...ot have enough knowledge. The professor provide an example that spreading the mussel to...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99588477366 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37121327034 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6858552176 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384214184619 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159766138503 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940632056263 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219628854759 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105357896712 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.