TPO 28
Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss about the adventure of Robert E. Peary to the North Pole. The article states that he reached the pole on April 7, 1909 and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the reasons are not compelling and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that the investigation of National Geographic Society approved his declare for reaching to North Pole. The professor refutes this point by saying that the investigation was not objective as the members were his friends. And it only took two days.
Second, the article claims that he went to North Pole in only 37 days. And Tom Avery showed that the travel was possible during that period. On the contrary, the professor contends that Tom Avery did not carry his food during his trip and the food was dropped by airplane. He also did his trip during a favor weather condition which was not like the trip of Peary.
Third, the reading averts that there are pictures that are supporting his claim to have reached the North Pole, as the sun's position established from the photographs corresponds exactly to the expected position. On the other hand, the lecture opposes this point by saying that there were no shadows to determine the position of sun. Also, the pictures were not clear, thus we are not sure about the credibility of his claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Shayooooon | 85 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 77
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?playing computer games is a waste of time. children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the modern world we should never be impolite to another person 83
- Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks? 70
- tpo 30, 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, thus, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81856540084 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37961216963 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.244517088 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5714285714 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37854312908 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136959768041 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142166134496 0.0662205650399 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215744315023 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046790554646 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.