tpo 29
The material discusses the concept of migration hypothesis of the edmonosaurs from Alaska’s North slope to the south during winter. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely edmonosaurs fed just on plants, but there were no plants in the north region during the winter; so, they had to migrate south to find food. Next, Edmonosaurs lived in a herd that coordinated their migrations. Finally, the edmontosaurs were physically able to migrate a long distance
Conversely, the listening challenges the points; one specific contradiction is the weather in Alaska’s North slope was warmer than today, which was a good growing condition for plants. Therefore, there were lots of vegetations during the winter too; so edmonosaurs did not need to migrate. In addition to that, living in a herd does not mean that animals could immigrate. They might live in a herd to provide extra protection from predators. For example, elks live in herds but do not immigrate. One final point, the old edmonosaurs were able to travel long distances; however, the juvenile ones were not physically capable of migrating; moreover, they could not survive on their own. Consequently, the edmonosaurs could not migrate and leave their younger ones alone.
In summary, there are obvious discrepancies in the presented information.
- the burning mirror 80
- tpo 25 the vessels could be used electric batteries 78
- tpo38 the extinction of several species at the end of Triassic period 76
- tpo 43 how agnostids lived and they behaved 80
- do you agree or dis agree? it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pancies in the presented information.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44396551724 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94204006303 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0955775039 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321509115907 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110189444032 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606725393297 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168389733099 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107951258058 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.