TPO 29-Integrated writing
In this set materials, the reading passage state that some edmonsaurs were migrated from Alaska to a warmer place, and brings 3 reasons for this claim. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the edmontosaurs had a special diet and they fed exclusively on planets; therefore, for finding this plant they had to migrate. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that in the past, the summer was warmer than today, and in the warmer climate most plants could grow. Also, in the past, the sunshine that receives into the earth was more than today. As the result, the plants could grow in the summer; therefore, they had a lot of dead plants for winter as a food. Hence, they did not need to migrate.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that the edmontosaur lived in the herb for migration like some animals such as carbiou and buffalo; conversely, what the lecturer state is different. She points that this animal lived in herb for providing extra protection from predators not for migration. Considering elk for instance. Elks live in herb for better protect the number of the group members and they did not need to migrate.
Finally, according to the reading passage the edmontosaurs had had high-speed for migration, they had to migrate about 1600 kilometers to arrived in the south. However, the lecturer believes that the edmontosaur had children. The children could not run as fast as young animals; also, the younger animals would not leave the children and went to the south, because the children would not protect themselves and lived alone
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
... had a lot of dead plants for winter as a food. Hence, they did not need to migrate. ...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 60, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...to the reading passage the edmontosaurs had had high-speed for migration, they had to m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03521126761 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50737851836 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503521126761 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.902184296 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221188359467 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777209254414 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484778541448 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130047515031 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391562315716 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.