tpo 3
The reading asserts that one of paintings from Rembrandt who was the most famous dutch painter was removed from the official catalog of his paintings because it could not be a work by rembrandt. The lecture, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that There is something inconsistent about the woman's dress in the portrait. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that some pigments were added over 100 years after original painting since someone wants to manipulated the original one.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that Rembrandt's paintings are famous because of special attention to light and shadow to painting. On the contrary the professor underlines the fact that, after cleaning the extra pigments which were added, the original painting indicate realistic light and shadow which makes sense.
Finally,it is stated in the reading that,the painting panel comprises several pieces of wood glued together, but rambrandt never use several pieces of wood glued together for panel of his paintings. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that, someone do this to made the painting more grand. In addition, the original single wood is as same tree as other Rembrandt's painting.
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 76
- Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- TPO42- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that There is something i...
^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... and shadow which makes sense. Finally,it is stated in the reading that,the paint...
^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...Finally,it is stated in the reading that,the painting panel comprises several pieces...
^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...his issue due to the fact that, someone do this to made the painting more grand. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, so, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24401913876 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5107994577 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7825056426 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.777777778 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.