It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
Throughout the history, human beings have been looking for ways to socialize with each other and create new chains of communication. Finding friends and keeping them are the best ways of socializing. Some people believe it is crucial to keep old friends instead of making new friends, while some others have an opposite opinion. From my vantage point, it is important for us to elevate our friend's circle and making new friends rather than keeping old friends.
First, it is significant to be mentioned that, making new friends gives us an opportunity to socialize with more people with different backgrounds and diverse cultures. By making friends we can enhance our social skills and get familiar with a wide range of cultures. For instance, when I was a high school student my friends was confined to just two people who I know from primary school. I knew everything about their family, their habits, their culture and etc. Most of the time we do not have new topics for discuss. Besides, there were no chance for us to know another people and learn about another cultures. But, after high school I start making new friends and spend my time with them, It was an appropriate opportunity for me to elevate my social cycle and learn many things.
Another reason which deserves some attention here is that, making new friends help us broaden our perspective in order to be a more creative person in solving problems. People can get help from their friend and use others opinion and others experience in predicaments. Thus, having more friends with more opinion would be more beneficial. The results of an experiment conducted in my country underscore the fact that, individuals with more friends come up with novel notions. And they solve problems in an efficient way.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely reach the conclusion that, making new friends is more important to keep old friends. New friends not only help us improve our social skill, but also broaden our perspective.
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 76
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task: Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Many people dream of owning their own business but are afraid of the risks, instead ofstarting a new business, however, one can buy a franchise. A franchise is a licenseissued by a large, usually well-known, company to a small business owner. Under thelic 66
- TPO42- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...eir family, their habits, their culture and etc. Most of the time we do not have new top...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... novel notions. And they solve problems in an efficient way. From what has been discussed above, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52616468197 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.122811615 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37881327315 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130625043528 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132603411005 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280219205897 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118156502728 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.