tpo 3
The text and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of the surmise which the specific painting does belong to the Rembrandt or not. while the text lists some factor such as the illogical clothing of the woman, the error in the light and shadow on the lady's face, and multi glued panel for the back of the painting as the main reasons which cast doubt on the accuracy of the painting, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage and come to her conclusion.
First of all, the professor refutes the inconsistent wearing of lady hypothesis, which in the passage is named as one of the main reasons for this doubt. Since Rembrandt is meticulous about the details and he did not let the lady to wear two counterparts pieces such as the servant clothing and the fur collar. The lecturer states that it is an explicit fact the painter is serious about the details; however, based on the recent examination of the painting by the X-ray the fur collar is added after 100 years from his death. Since they like to enhance the value of the painting, they add the fur collar to the white linen without consideration of the main painting subject and details.
Next, the reading part uses the reason that the painter is an expert in the illustration of light and shadow as a reason for this suspicion. Based upon the text assumption, the lady's face should be partially shadowed since the fur collar absorbs all lights instead of reflecting. However, the face is totally bright by the reflection of light. The professor argues the truth of this claim. As the lecturer states the fur collar is not the part of an original painting. If the additional fur collar removes from the painting real portrait will be completely realistic and it is shaped based on the painter's craft in the light and shadow.
Finally, the lecturer argues that the fact of a panel with various pieces. Meanwhile, the article presumes that the painter solely used one cogent panel contradicted from the panel type of this specific painting. Based upon the professor's evidence the extra pieces are added later to enlarge the panel. Besides, the texture of the main panel is like the same tree texture used for his other painting panel.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all doubts on all of the claim and theories presented in the reading.
- ets.test 1 86
- 1.Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain yo 66
- TPO53Independent Task-Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy pro 80
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ng does belong to the Rembrandt or not. while the text lists some factor such as the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ofessor argues the truth of this claim. As the lecturer states the fur collar is n...
^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ffectively casts doubt on all doubts on all of the claim and theories presented in the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279735682819 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.114537444934 0.158904122519 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748898678414 0.0723426182421 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0330396475771 0.0435111971325 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176211453744 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151982378855 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0352422907489 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45007195536 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0154185022026 0.0208969081088 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.191629955947 0.128158765124 150% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00440528634361 0.0158828679856 28% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00660792951542 0.0114777025283 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2431.0 1645.83664459 148% => OK
No of words: 422.0 271.125827815 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76066350711 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.04852973271 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317535545024 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.236966824645 0.287516216867 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165876777251 0.187439937562 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0781990521327 0.113142543107 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45007195536 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45971563981 0.539623497131 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.9824032637 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8235294118 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.882588235 49.3711431718 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.878197800319 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 48.5202118762 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.82666666667 1.90840788429 148% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178401589809 0.142949733639 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0965702968778 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.751749492185 0.631733273073 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106330795154 0.139662658121 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.585265514963 0.414875509568 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.192950662071 0.0530846634433 363% => No any connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.62251655629 221% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.