The reading and the lecture both take about offering the employees the choice of working four hours per day per week instead of five days per day per week for eight hours per day. The reading present three benefits for this which the professor in the lecture refutes every single one of them.
First, the reading talks about how this could increase the company profit. Limiting the workhours to four per day will lower the work stress for the employes and as a result fewer errors by the exhausted workers. However, the lecture contradicts this, by saying that the companies would spend more money to the new hires, because of the training, medical health benefits and other requirements which will have the negative impact on the companies profit.
Secondly, the reading suggests that the more the staff is in a company, the better the work would be and this is as a result of the improvement in the employment rate which will follow the work hours lowering. The lecture refutes this by saying that this will be another factor who will affect badly on the companies profits. Requiring more work space and more supplies, computers, for instance, will also cost lots of money to afford.
Lastly, the reading says that the employees free time will grant the to do more activites and hobbies. However, the lecture argues that this free will increase the risk of lowering the quality of life for the employees.It claimes that it will dicrease the stability of work and make them endure a lower opportunity of getting the promotions for example, or they might be the first who will lose their jobs. As the companies might offer these perks to the five hours working employees who could take over the job by staying working for five hours instead of four.
Essay topics
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Delara
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...g the quality of life for the employees.It claimes that it will dicrease the stabi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77302631579 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28373590979 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480263157895 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.032799263 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.909090909 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458216472537 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211732098991 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0150041310501 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0321370208033 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126178839774 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.