Both the reading and the lecture discuses buzzer, which is a term refers to anew tactic the commercial agencies use to attract customers to buy their products by hiring individual people to act as buzzers. The reading discusses three points that are against this tactic. however, the lecture refutes every single one of them.
First, the reading states that the consumers should know that the buzzers be paid for promoting certain product. For the big diufference it would make to br truthful and not misleading. The lecture opposes this. By sying that, this is not the truth. The companies tend to hire people who utilizes and know the product very good. Unlike the paid celebrities who can appear reading a few lines about the product, the buzzer can tell the truth about the product he or she used. Which is the phone line in this case?
second, the reading states that the buzzers are pretending to be private individuals, so the consumers will be less critically to their presentation of an item. The lecture refutes this point by saying that the opposit is true. People ask more questions to the buzzer about the price, the service provided by the phone line and how long it has been used by the buzzer. If it is not right for them they will definitly won't buy it.
Lastly, the reading states that buzzer tactic is harmful to the social relationshps.It will be the reason for the mistrust and dishonesty. The lecture opposes this point and consider it stubid. it states that if the product is known to be bad so no buzzer will be hired to promote it. If the consumer try the phone service the buzzer prootes, they will love it. So, people who try it and see its benifits according to the information they already got about it this will reflect the truthfulness and openness to people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... to anew tactic the commercial agencies use to attract customers to buy their produ...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ee points that are against this tactic. however, the lecture refutes every single one o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...hich is the phone line in this case? second, the reading states that the buzzers ar...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...c is harmful to the social relationshps.It will be the reason for the mistrust and...
^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...oses this point and consider it stubid. it states that if the product is known to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69620253165 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4150691263 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512658227848 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1302187391 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1052631579 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319808088157 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098417416011 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717575043269 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199938687291 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680599100947 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.