TPO 32
The reading specifies that submarines who patrolling in some are hear strange sounds and provide three theories about what might have caused the odd sounds. However, the professor say that author's theories have certained problem and introduce three reasons and refute them all.
First of all, the reading assert that the strange sounds is produce by male and female orca. In fact, the orca live in that area and use this sound to attract male. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea reasoning that orca do not live in the deep area where the submarine patroll and it is not possible for submarines to hear this sounds in deep area. Also, the russian sonar can detect the sound of orca.
Second, based on the reading, giand squids are responsible for quack noises and the reason the sonar cannot detect them is because they have soft bodies with no skeleton. In additon, giant squids are intelligent animal and it is plausible they approches to the submarines out of curiosity. In contrast, the professor states that the strange noises disappear after a time and giant squids still living in that area and it is not rational for submarine to think this sounds suddenly stops. Therefore, giant squids are not making this sounds.
Third, according to the reading, foreign submarine from other countries patrolling the area and unintentionally they emitt sounds. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this point by saying that the strange sounds move around and change direction in a fast way and other submarines cannot make this sound since they do not have technology to change their direction fast and make a silence engine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'heard'.
Suggestion: heard
...t submarines who patrolling in some are hear strange sounds and provide three theori...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...the reason the sonar cannot detect them is because they have soft bodies with no skeleton....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fast way" with adverb for "fast"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sounds move around and change direction in a fast way and other submarines cannot make this s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0221402214 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46151185055 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6853575278 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486887207052 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185924663484 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577565577634 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289545686645 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443499756612 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.