Quakers are the odd underwater sounds in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean moving fast, which can not be detect by the submarine's sonar. The passage supposes three hypotheses regarding the causes of quakers, all of which are considered impossible by the lecture.
First off, the professor in the lecture does not think they are caused by the courtship ritual of male and female ocra whales, because ocras always live in the surface of water rather than deep marine, although the two kinds of sounds are similar with each other.
In addition, that giant quids, known as intelligent animals, emitting the sound with curiosity about the submarines is also dismissed by the professor. In her view, quackers only lasting about twenty years does not agree with the fact that giant quids continue to live in the deep ocean.
Last, it's considered unlikely that the sounds come from foreign military technology, for the reason that foreign submarines have directions and are capable of moving around. However, sonars which can accompany with the submarines have not been invented yet.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 76
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 85
- TPO 55 Writing IntegratedBecause of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification 80
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...ng fast, which can not be detect by the submarines sonar. The passage supposes three hypot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...similar with each other. In addition, that giant quids, known as intelligent a...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[2]
Message: Consider using 'does disagree that' or 'does agree that'.
Suggestion: does disagree that; does agree that
...uackers only lasting about twenty years does not agree with the fact that giant quids continue to live in the dee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inue to live in the deep ocean. Last, its considered unlikely that the sounds ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 177.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14124293785 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39118578926 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7892117046 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365536420904 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155162502064 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776750908479 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195319790388 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438582468866 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.