Both the reading and the listening discuss the theories of the "quicker" sound heard in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The author of the passage provides three plausible theories to explain the strange sound. However, the professor refutes all of the claims made in the article, and her reasons are as follows.
To start with, the passage points out that male and female orca whales make this weird noise during courtship ritual. Nevertheless, the lecturer challenges the points by mentions that whales are habitating on the surface ocean and it's unlikely to hear their voice in the deep water. Besides, their sound can be detected by sonar, so the sounds of whales are not the convincing reason.
Second, the reading contends that those sounds might be made by giant squids, a kind of invertebrates. Nevertheless, the professor argues that researchers had already found the sounds of giant squid in 1960. However, their sounds disappeared in 1980. Consequently, It's no reason that they stopped the sound for decades and restarted after 20 years.
Last, the article states that it's possible that the sounds come from other country's submarines. Conversely, the professor maintains that the submarine can't change direction and movie so quickly. Besides, the current technology is not advanced enough to establish a fast and silent engine. Therefore, it's impossible that the voice is from the other country's submarine.
In sum, the professor successfully casts doubts on all of the claims presented in the article.
- Agree or disagree? People can solve the most problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families; help from the government is often not necessary. 73
- TPO31- Integrated writing 65
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 85
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 73
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e sound. However, the professor refutes all of the claims made in the article, and her rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...unds disappeared in 1980. Consequently, Its no reason that they stopped the sound f...
^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t they stopped the sound for decades and restarted after 20 years. Last, the a...
^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... professor maintains that the submarine cant change direction and movie so quickly. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... professor successfully casts doubts on all of the claims presented in the article.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, conversely, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29387755102 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78487017188 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3552536743 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4666666667 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266881388816 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806525275931 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539336360467 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120468936525 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731702475271 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.