TPO 35- Task 1
The reading asserts that the Voynich manuscript which is written in an entirely unknown script, is hard to be decoded and no one can understand the book's content so far. The passage provides three theories to explain the origin of the manuscript. The professor, meanwhile, casts serious doubts on this claim and believes that none of the three arguments are convincing enough to declare that who the author of this manuscript is.
First, the reading passage states that the manuscript is a genuine work on some scientific or magical subject written in a complicated secret code. The passage adds that Anthony Ascham could be the author because many plant illustrations in the Voynich manuscript are quite similar to Ascham's book. In contrast, the professor claims that Anthony Ascham was an ordinary scientist in the field of physics with simple ideas. Thus, based on his knowledge and standpoints, it is improbable for him to be the author of such intricately written book.
Second, the lecturer makes the point that it is unlikely for this book to be written to sell to the rich people because these codes are real and complex. He comments that sixteenth-century people were full enough and it was easy to deceive them by simple books. Therefore, there were no need to write such a complexly coded book. However, the reading declares that the manuscript is a fake one and its text has no real meaning. In fact, it was composed by Edward Kelly, who was famous for extracting money from nobles by pretending to have magical powers and write some fake magic books to sell them.
Finally, although the reading passage posits that the manuscript is a new fake written by Wilfrid M. Voynich, who planned to sell the fake as a mysterious old book for attractive offers, the professor disagrees and thinks that according to the recent analysis of the manuscript, this theory is problematic. He believes that the evaluated ink and vellum showed that these appliances dated back to four thousand years ago. In this regard, since it is impossible that the Voynich found a four thousand years old ink to make the manuscript, it was not composed by him.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-30 | Jason bang | 68 | view |
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 13- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO31- independent Writing: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- TPO 11- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reason 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o explain the origin of the manuscript. The professor, meanwhile, casts serious dou...
^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plex. He comments that sixteenth-century people were full enough and it was easy ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 365.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88493150685 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64064681 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517808219178 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6384423662 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4375 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.