TPO 35 writing
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the origin of the Voynich manuscript.
First, the professor argues that Ascham was a ordinary physicist which his books didn't presented any novel and cutting-edge knowledge in its own period. Although reading's hypothesis believes that many illustrations, contexts and contents in Voyinch manuscript are similar to Ascham's book, there is no convincing evidence that support this idea. Thus, the professor rejects this proposal.
Second, it is mentioned in the reading that the manuscript may not be genuiue and it could be a fake book which its content is not meaningful and it might created by Kelley in order to gain money with it by pretending that this book has magical powers with made up alphabets. On the contrary, the professor draws that Kelley could use simpler transcripts instead of inventing such complex and advance coding system. As professor states, Kelley was person known as a swindler, but making this complicated and sophisticated coding system is thing that is beyond Kelley's abilities. Hence, this theory is repudiated by professor too.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that Voynich might wrote this book by himself to sell it for a good price if he receive a attractive and valuable offer. Based on this theory, this is a modern fake version of antique book which only created to sold as a ancient and mysterious one. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that scientists are able to determine objects' date via modern methods, suggesting that if Voyinch wrote this book, he must have used a kind of ink which should be older than 400 years ago. Thus, this theory is rejected by professor either because of lack of sufficient evidences to prove it.
- TPO 26 Integrated 80
- TPO 20 Integrated 80
- TPO 33 80
- TPO 43 90
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t, the professor argues that Ascham was a ordinary physicist which his books didn...
^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...as a ordinary physicist which his books didnt presented any novel and cutting-edge kn...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'receives'.
Suggestion: receives
...mself to sell it for a good price if he receive a attractive and valuable offer. Based ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... sell it for a good price if he receive a attractive and valuable offer. Based on...
^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ique book which only created to sold as a ancient and mysterious one. In contrast...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, third, thus, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63308859622 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0849621489 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.