TPO 39
In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that three reasons to to justified mass-extinction at the end of the Triassic period. While in the listening the professor casts doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that Non of these reasos that mentioned in the reading are not good explnation for this mass-extinction.
First of all, it the text it is clearly mentioned that a dicline of sea leve is responsible for this mass-extinction. However, the professor claims that the evedince show that some fluctuation in the sea leve was occured in this period. But this kind of fluctuation in sea level take about million years and is this long time the animals and plants have enough time to adapt with the new condition. She says that just one sudden fluctuation is sea level can led to this climate changing and there is not any evidence for this occurance.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that volcanose eruption and a increase in the amoung of So2 is the reason for mass-extinction. She says that increase in So2 in atmospher can has a cooling effect. But this gas cannot remain in atmospher longe enough to can produce this cooling effect. Because So2 combind with water in the atmospher and come back to ground as shape of acid rains.
Finally, in the text it is stated that an asteroids is responsible for mass-extinction. The professor subscribes that the researcher could not found any evidence of asteroid hit at this time. And the just one asteroid hit are related to many time before this extinction.
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 88
- TPO41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-39- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 71
- TPO 49 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ng passage discusses that three reasons to to justified mass-extinction at the end of...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese reasos that mentioned in the reading are not good explnation for this mass-ex...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... of fluctuation in sea level take about million years and is this long time the animals...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h this idea that volcanose eruption and a increase in the amoung of So2 is the re...
^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...s that increase in So2 in atmospher can has a cooling effect. But this gas cannot r...
^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an asteroid' or simply 'asteroids'?
Suggestion: an asteroid; asteroids
... Finally, in the text it is stated that an asteroids is responsible for mass-extinction. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...he just one asteroid hit are related to many time before this extinction.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83955223881 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86569836353 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488805970149 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2481584923 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.