TPO 39 - integrated writing

The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is the massive extinction, but the listening casts doubt at three main points.

At the first point, the reading states that at the end of Triassic, the sea level fluctuated. It destroys the population of species that live in the coastal area and shallow ocean. According to the listening, these species are capable of adapting the gradual change of the environment. In addition, the decrease in sea level in this period is gradual.

At the second point, the reading believes that the volcano releases lots of sulfur dioxide into the air. It prompts a climate cooling. On the contrary, the listening argues that this chemical just exists in a short period of time. Raining reduces a great deal of it.

At the last point, the reading mentions that the asteroid strikes the Earth. Its consequence is the period of no sunlight on the surface. However, the listening confirms that there are a little number of scientists who believe in this theory. Because the time that asteroid hit the Earth is too long before the extinction occurrence.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...at this chemical just exists in a short period of time. Raining reduces a great deal of it. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... scientists who believe in this theory. Because the time that asteroid hit the Earth is...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9247311828 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53699645708 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9356826812 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.4615384615 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3076923077 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.