The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is the maintenance of human presence on Venus, but the listening proposes a solution to challenges given in the reading.
At the first point, the reading states that the atmospheric pressure on Venus's surface is too large, at least 90 times greater the Earth's surface pressure. This means that spacecraft landing on Venus would be crushed by the extreme pressure. According to the listening, a place 50 kilometers above the surface has the normal pressure similar to that on Earth. Therefore, there would be no fear of crushed spacecrafts.
At the second point, the reading mentions that there are no reservoirs of water on Venus, and its atmosphere is mostly made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid. For that reason, water and oxygen would have to be supplied form Earth. However, the listening argues that water and oxygen can be produced using chemicals obtained from compounds found on Venus. Therefore, humans can create water and oxygen without needing supply from Earth.
At the third point, the reading believes that about 60 percent of the sunlight is reflected back by thick clouds, and some of the remaining sunlight are blocked by a layer of carbon dioxide below the clouds. Thus, very little light can reach the surface, and humans cannot get electricity from solar cells. On the contrary, the listening confirms that while a place above the carbon dioxide layer is still blocked by clouds, humans can use solar cells to utilize sunlight from both below the clouds and reflected above the clouds. Hence, solar energy can be created.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... is reflected back by thick clouds, and some of the remaining sunlight are blocked by a lay...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, while, at least, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42957317008 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8669161626 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488854144436 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165214605727 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076166388983 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247168828625 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100790792675 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.