People’s happiness has been a debatable issue. Many people argue that since the world is changing too rapidly, people are being less happy than in the past. Personally, I disagree with this argument.
On one hand, what takes my priority is increased satisfaction. It is well noted that in this ever-changing world, there are being more and more new job opportunities open to people. That leaves an increasing number of job choices to pick from. For that reason, people stand a golden chance to find suitable work, one that they are certain to earn success from. Subsequently, people find enjoyment within their work, which fills them with happiness and excitement in life. More interestingly, our world, with new innovations arriving everyday, is gradually becoming more convenient for us. Everything is being upgraded: cellphones, computers, transportation vehicles, houses, etc. They are making our lives more convenient, helping people do things quicker and more efficiently. It follows that people have more free time after daily hard-working jobs or tiring hassles. They are presented the opportunity to follow their hobbies, to relax, to have some fun. For that reason, people become happier and more satisfied.
On the other hand, some might say that things are altering too rapidly, and everyone is unable to keep up with current trends. This makes us miserable compared to the past, and prevents us from enjoying our lives. However, that is not necessarily the case. Only when new things benefit people will they become trends. Otherwise, if people find them difficult to accept, they surely disappear after a very short period of time. Furthermore, along with constant new inventions come new forms of entertainment. We have witnessed in the past few decades the creation and powerful growth of video games. We also saw the relatively recent beginning of social media, now prominent with millions of users. These new innovations with entertaining purposes give people a wider variety of leisure activities. Consequently, people are able to spend their free time in more satisfying ways. This brings joy and excitement to people lives. By and large, the claim that the world changing too quickly reduces our happiness is intrinsically false.
To sum up, for all the aforementioned reasons, a constantly altering world results in more satisfaction. It is highly recommended that people take my writing into detailed consideration to make an appropriate decision on human happiness.
- TPO 28 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 78
- TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 75
- TPO 30 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use spec 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ur world, with new innovations arriving everyday, is gradually becoming more convenient ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hey surely disappear after a very short period of time. Furthermore, along with constant new i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, well, by and large, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32828282828 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8928770945 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593434343434 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7446249591 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3571428571 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 25.0 11.8709677419 211% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259854530408 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676686178123 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573343216988 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173010409955 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926732192872 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.