The reading and lecture both discuss the possibility of living on venous surface. While the reading provides three reasons that inhibit the life on venous, the professor refute, saying that none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that the atmosphere pressure on venous is very high. So, anything will land on the venous surface will crushed. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that we can stablish station like ballon on venous like 50 coulometer. As a result, the high pressure problem can be solved. Moreover, the high pressure will be equal to the earth pressure. So, nothing will crushed.
In addition, the article avers that we have to get oxygen and water supply from earth. This is because there is no water or oxygen on venous surface. On the other hand, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that there is carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid on the venous surface. Furthermore, these chemicals substance can make chemical reaction with chemical materials. So, we can get oxygen and water and there is no need to import them from earth.
Finally, the reading mentions that due to the thick clouds there is not enough sunlight will reach the venous surface. Nevertheless, the professor questions this idea by explaining that clouds is there . However, these clouds are nit thick enough. So, the sunlight can go through. As a result, the sunlight can power the electric station.
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 61
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Tpo 28- integrated writing 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crush'
Suggestion: crush
...ng will land on the venous surface will crushed. However, the professor argues this not...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'coulometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'coulometers'.
Suggestion: coulometers
...h station like ballon on venous like 50 coulometer. As a result, the high pressure problem...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crush'
Suggestion: crush
...to the earth pressure. So, nothing will crushed. In addition, the article avers that...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chemicals'' or 'chemical's'?
Suggestion: chemicals'; chemical's
... the venous surface. Furthermore, these chemicals substance can make chemical reaction wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... idea by explaining that clouds is there . However, these clouds are nit thick eno...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03765690377 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43561536828 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9784815738 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.8888888889 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2777777778 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233944942524 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842397755909 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538020553153 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134771425737 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725725496001 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.06 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.