TPO 41 INTEGRATE WRITTING
In the passage, three arguments support that new regulations to coal ash are unnecessary.In the lecture, however, the professor denied them all by given following reasons.
First, using liner to prevent coal ash is not sufficient. The professor argued that old devices may contribute to make environment worser. For example, the harmful chemicals that produced by liner may comtaminate water body.
Second, comsumer will not consider the harmful recycle products alone. The professor thinks that other harmful product like murkery which contribute to long-term damage may be the first consideration of comsumers.
Finally, professor thinks that the cost of new regulations is not too large. Although it cost million dollars to treat coal ash, ratio seems little when only 1 percent it owns in total.
- It is easier to be educated nowadays 81
- 30 integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- TPO 41 INTEGRATE WRITTING 40
- Do you agree or disagree after high school graduates should take at least one year off to work or travel before entering university 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...regulations to coal ash are unnecessary.In the lecture, however, the professor den...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ions is not too large. Although it cost million dollars to treat coal ash, ratio seems ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 680.0 1373.03311258 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 125.0 270.72406181 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 4.04702891845 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75583453785 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 145.348785872 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.688 0.540411800872 127% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 419.366225166 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7489370595 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341295738616 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137963158942 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781535441833 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188133303049 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478795815034 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.