The reading and the speaker discussing the strict regulation regarding the coal ash which is the by product of the power plants but they are arguing things in very contrasts ways.
Firstly, reading passage says that rules and regulation regarding already existed for regulation of coal ash, so there is no need of strict regulation for example the plants has liner system for ponds. But, the lecture refutes this statement by saying that whatever regulation is there that only applicable for the new plants and what about the old plants. It makes lots of damages to the environment.
Secondly, reading suggests that now the recycling process gives the benefits like bricks and the concrete which is by products they are getting through recycling process. So, if, regulation is strict then supplier will not by the these products because it causes the huge amount for them. Still, the speaker refuses this point by stating with one example that mercury which they do the long recycling process like more than 15 years but now also companies are buying the mercury as well.
Thirdly, reading claims that strict rules and regulations makes the electricity more expensive for the consumer due to the recycling process of coal ash. Again, the professor opposes this point by explaining that the overall recycling process causes 15 billions dollars but when it divided by all consumer it cost only one percent extra which reasonable for the consumer to maintain the good environment.
To sum up, the power plants companies representatives states that strict rules and the regulation not necessary because already rules are implemented, it cost supplier not to bye the by products and it cost more expenses for the consumer but the speaker refutes all these points with reasonable evidences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the by product of the power plants but they are arguing things in very contrast...
^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow also companies are buying the mercury as well. Thirdly, reading claims that...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'for example', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264331210191 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.143312101911 0.158904122519 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0732484076433 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0668789808917 0.0435111971325 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031847133758 0.0277247811725 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124203821656 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0573248407643 0.0370669169778 155% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5365549581 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015923566879 0.0208969081088 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0031847133758 0.00154638098197 206% => OK
Determiners: 0.12101910828 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0031847133758 0.0158828679856 20% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0286624203822 0.0114777025283 250% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1794.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 293.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1228668942 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38566552901 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307167235495 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180887372014 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116040955631 0.113142543107 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5365549581 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484641638225 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.3260626909 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 29.3 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2488661614 49.3711431718 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.4 132.220823453 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 0.878197800319 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 60.0167235495 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.84210526316 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559922291016 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165107453197 0.142949733639 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0996160862339 0.0787303798458 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.737080313641 0.631733273073 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192644758276 0.139662658121 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.300542911707 0.266732575781 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967559823082 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42359212995 0.414875509568 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0624334613477 0.0530846634433 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397710900006 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546226485228 0.0528353158467 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.