TPO- 42 integrated
The reading passage and the lecture are both about injuries happen to wild birds as a result of glasses that used in building. While the passage states that there are several solutions to prevent these injuries the lecture contradicts these claims and provides evidence to the contrary.
First, the author argues that using on-way glass for building is an effective way because in this way the window seems to be a solid barrier and birds don’t fly through the glass. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that in this way the problem is remain because these glasses reflect like a mirror for birds. So, the reflection of trees and sky in those mirror make mistake for this animals.
Second, the passage holds the view that using colorful design for these ordinary glasses is useful. Birds can distinguish stripes and will change their route. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that there is two problems with the solution. First of all, the birds think can ride through them and the second problem is that in this way the inside of the buildings become dark for people.
Furthermore, according to the reading passage using magnetic field equipment near buildings can be a helpful solution. These devices can help birds to find the right direction. However, the lecturer makes it clear that birds use magnetic field to navigation for long distance not for short distance. They use eye and light to navigate in short distance. So, this solution cannot prevent injuries of the birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...he idea that in this way the problem is remain because these glasses reflect like a mi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nd sky in those mirror make mistake for this animals. Second, the passage holds the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, second, so, while, in contrast, in short, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96442687747 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35895209159 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6451166834 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7142857143 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396221735892 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131740496782 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796654701924 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231309483047 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547905803215 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.