TPO 44
The passage and the lecture discuss whether the silver coins were introduced to American native by Norse or not. The reading mentions that there are not any evidence for showing this statement that silver coins had been brought by Norse. Whereas, the lecturer disagrees with this attitude and points out several evidence that approve this historical event.
First, the passage expresses that it is not rational that we say the Norse had brought the silver to America due to the distance of the place that Norse was settled is far away from the place that the silver coins are presence. However the professor in the lecture declares that merchants of America were inclined to obtain valuable objects; therefore, they had brought silver to their own cities.
Second, the reading believes that if the coins were related to Norse, they had to be found in the place that Norse was settled. Although the woman in lecture has negative opinion because of she thinks that it is fair that Norse returned the residue coins to their country; thus, there is not reason that he left them in North America.
Finally, the passage declares that the silver coins had value just for the european due to they used them as money, however the silver coins didnot have any ancient for native American. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this idea because probebly Norse had changed the applicant of the silver coins to jewerly that it was so beautiful and attractive for native American.
Although the passage attitude is that the cause of coins popularity in ancient America is separate from historical event relevant to Norse, The lecture disagrees with this idea due to the presented evidences in passage are not rational.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’s deve 66
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer. 66
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...grees with this attitude and points out several evidence that approve this historical event. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ace that the silver coins are presence. However the professor in the lecture declares t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because she' instead.
Suggestion: because she
...e woman in lecture has negative opinion because of she thinks that it is fair that Norse retur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96853146853 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3174539249 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0146566498 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.1 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403157919933 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184543101474 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761303361705 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239642203405 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598392610835 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.