In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that the coins that found in North America not actually related to the Europian people but it was placed with someone to the confusing and misleading archeologist. While the professor in the listening casts doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that a lot of archaeologists beliefs that this evidence is not fake and there is a evidence that substantiated relationship of this coins with European people.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that the coin was found in the place that very far from another site that documented that Norse people presented. However, the professor claims that it is completely possible that people travel great distances for trade and came back and these people had this ability to do this travel.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that because of no other coin has not been found in the Canadian sites so it is shown that this coin is not good evidence. She says that it is not necessary to pack up and placed it on the Canadian site. It is possible that they pike up it and after that came back it by themselves.
Finally, yet importantly, in the text, it is stated that the native American people did not use from the European coins so the presence of the silver coin in this area is incredible. The professor subscribes that it is possible that this coins had had another used for this native people, for example, it was attractive for them because of stunning and beautiful and the Norse people used it because of its beauty for trade with native people.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- TPO 3: Agree or disagree: It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 60
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... this evidence is not fake and there is a evidence that substantiated relationshi...
^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ence that substantiated relationship of this coins with European people. First of a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...bes that it is possible that this coins had had another used for this native people, fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67730496454 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54759285694 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6134905863 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.555555556 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367722867726 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157963533044 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949110214637 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226341446565 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146718157996 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.