TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to

Both the reading and the listening passages focus on a topic about European silver coins minted in the eleventh century which were discovered in the state of Maine in the North of America. While the reading tries to explain why the story about bringing the coins to the United States was a historical fake, the listening puts forward many very convincing arguments to show this is not true and these coins are genuine historical evidence.

First, according to the text, the distance between Maine, at which coins were discovered, is very far from the North America. However, the professor casts doubt about this by indicating this fact that many other objects were founded by archaeologists were in long distance from the North America. Moreover, she says that many of Native American were so interested to find objects during their travelling.

Second, the article argues that because no other coins have been discovered at Norse habitation in the States, thus they did not bring them to the North America with themselves. Conversely, the speaker rejects that claim and says it might be quite possible when Norse packed up to come back to Europe they bring them back because they were very valuable.

Third, as mentioned in the text, these silver coins would probably be useless to the Norse when they came into the North America. Nevertheless, the lecturer makes it clear that these coins were valuable and also very appealing. Therefore, if they had not function similar to the today money, coins may be have used in producing necklaces or other type of jewelries.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'functioned'.
Suggestion: functioned
...y appealing. Therefore, if they had not function similar to the today money, coins may b...
^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'while']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225694444444 0.261695866417 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.173611111111 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0798611111111 0.0723426182421 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0729166666667 0.0435111971325 168% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0416666666667 0.0277247811725 150% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121527777778 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0486111111111 0.0370669169778 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45131873754 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0347222222222 0.0208969081088 166% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118055555556 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0104166666667 0.0158828679856 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0173611111111 0.0114777025283 151% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1575.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98859315589 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.300380228137 0.374372842146 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247148288973 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171102661597 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106463878327 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45131873754 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.0360058518 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.093038881 49.3711431718 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 132.220823453 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 51.0148288973 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.3734939759 1.90840788429 72% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.709652713812 0.549887131256 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151602128558 0.142949733639 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0757777134854 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.662340219643 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122110004536 0.139662658121 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.349963218804 0.266732575781 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153176358325 0.103435571967 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366985843467 0.414875509568 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0622692957969 0.0530846634433 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.497716327133 0.40443939384 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379729691218 0.0528353158467 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.