Both the passage and professor, discuss about the silver European coin and the origin it comes from. The passages claims that, the theory that, silver coin was brought to North America by European explorers cannot be true on account of three reasons, whereas the professor denies this claim. The details of this contrast is presented in the following.
First, the article states that, the place where the coin was found, is far away from the lands where Norse visited. As a result, it is less probable that Norse had taken it to that place, yet, the lecturer claims that American natives used to travel distant to trade and that means, they might had taken it with themselves.
Second, the article mentions that no other similar silver coin was explored in North America, which makes it less possible that European had brought it with themselves. In contrast, the lecturer believes that, European had packed and taken all of their stuff by the time they left, so no other silver coin remained in North America.
Eventually, the article uses the fact that Native American did not use silver coin and could not recognize it, so European had no reason to bring any silver coin with themselves. While, lecturer illustrates that, native American liked beautiful things and would trade over them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
... the origin it comes from. The passages claims that, the theory that, silver coin was ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tiful things and would trade over them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97247706422 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25462332094 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.343765152 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400623793147 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171385857381 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857401639404 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254923566987 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483474761521 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.