The reading claims that paleontologists have long wondered whether Pterosaurs were not capable of powered flight or only able to glide and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor find all of supporting reasons dubious and provide some evidence that shows they may were capable to flight.
The reading passage argues that modern reptiles are cold blooded, consequently ancient reptiles were cold blooded and cold blood animals typically have slow metabolism and unable to produce a of energy. On contrary, the lecturer point out that some fossils have been founded which shows that Pterosaurs were not cold blood. She stats that fossils had dense hair. According to professor, warm-blooded animals have dense hair to protect them from cold weather Therefore, Pterosaurs were able to produce the energy which power flight required.
Furthermore, article bring the idea that, Pterosaurs were so heavy that they would not have been able to be keep airborne by powered flight. Conversely, the speaker states that Pterosaurs bones were hallow and this reduce animal’s weight. So, she refute this idea that Pterosaurs were not able to fly because of their weight.
Finally, the reading hold the view that Pterosaurs did not have big, powerful muscles in their back legs to launch themselves into the air. In contrast, the professor dismiss this issue due to the fact that, Pterosaurs had four legs. Birds have two legs to run and jump while Pterosaurs had four large legs that enable them to run enough and jump to the air.
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 88
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 68
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 76
- TPO 47: integrated writing 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e slow metabolism and unable to produce a of energy. On contrary, the lecturer po...
^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
...eaker states that Pterosaurs bones were hallow and this reduce animal's weight. S...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...is reduce animal's weight. So, she refute this idea that Pterosaurs were not able...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them to run enough and jump to the air.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19920318725 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48174235055 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557768924303 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.918203856 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.599550459036 0.272083759551 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214221270784 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104543838013 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334767460457 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548378671411 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.