TPO 48 Integrated writing essay
The reading passage proposes three solutions to save frog population from declining whereas according to the professor, none of them are practical.
In the reading passage, the author claims that farmers should be prohibited to use harmful pesticides in areas close to frog population. However, the professor in the lecture challenges that this method is not economically practical. To be specific, farmers rely on the pesticides to decrease the loss of crops and keep competitive in the market, so such laws are likely to lose more crops and reduce the yield.
Moreover, the lecturer objects to the second proposal that researchers have discovered a method to prevent frogs from infecting by a fetal fungus. She points out that it is extremely hard to capture each individual frog and treat them. Besides, this method cannot stop the fungus onto next generation, which means researchers have to repeat the process again and again. It is incredibly expensive.
Finally, the professor argues that the true reason that threatens the frogs habitats is the global warming rather than the human activities. Based on the fact that global warming has contributed to the disappearance of many water and wetlands, forbidding humans from using water and wetlands cannot reverse the situation of the loss of frogs habitats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...has contributed to the disappearance of many water and wetlands, forbidding humans f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2654028436 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73543072546 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616113744076 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7786563227 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380579504905 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125341151565 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882106829403 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203327697347 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392146957378 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.