The reading passage contends that there are several methods that have been proposed to solve the problem of declining from populations which help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the method in the reading passage that frog populations have harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals for protecting insects from damaging farm crops. This is attributed to the fact that it is not economically practical if laws prohibited the farmers from using pesticides neighboring frog habitats. It would damage and loose more crops. Thus, the reading passage’s first method is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the method in the reading passage that a fungus is a major factor in frog population decline, which has spread around the world with deadly effect. This is because even several ways have discovered by researchers that treat or prevent infection, these ways would be complicated and expensive to apply. First, for using this way, people have to capture each individual frog to apply the treatments. Second, it could not be applied to offspring of frogs applied before and every frog should be captured and applied the treatments. Consequently, the reading passage’s second method is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the method in the reading passage that the frog habitats are threatened, which makes frog populations to be in decline. It is obvious that it is true that their habitats have damaged by human activities. However, it is not big threat to their habitats. The main threat in frog habitats is global warming having occurring in the world. Due to the global warming, many habitats such as water and wetland habitats have declined. As a result, the reading passage’s last method is refuted.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 86
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- 41. A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, howe 83
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.198863636364 0.158904122519 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0723426182421 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0340909090909 0.0435111971325 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0227272727273 0.0277247811725 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102272727273 0.128828473217 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0795454545455 0.0370669169778 215% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.83111925498 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0255681818182 0.0208969081088 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102272727273 0.128158765124 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0113636363636 0.0158828679856 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0227272727273 0.0114777025283 198% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1921.0 1645.83664459 117% => OK
No of words: 307.0 271.125827815 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25732899023 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.403908794788 0.374372842146 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299674267101 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198697068404 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133550488599 0.113142543107 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83111925498 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 52.6589481088 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0588235294 21.7502111507 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8759729188 49.3711431718 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 21.7502111507 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.878197800319 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.0262502395 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.68888888889 1.90840788429 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592016894892 0.549887131256 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133741909601 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0816066453803 0.0787303798458 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515489584628 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140517269511 0.139662658121 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225468919296 0.266732575781 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117363860331 0.103435571967 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.430349034737 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0444457901321 0.0530846634433 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.422037841598 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497731765648 0.0528353158467 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.