Both the reading and lecture delve to discuss the causes and solutions for the declining of Frogs’ populations. While the reading comes with three solutions and sees them as pretty effective; with a contrasting lens, the lecture comes to refute every solution and give specific reasons that prove its flaws.
First and foremost, the lecturer states that the prohibition of pesticides’ use suggested by the reading text is neither practical or realistic because farmers depend on pesticides to treat their lands, and without them, they will lose crops leading to a low annual yield compared to their competitors.
Furthermore, the professor refutes the second suggestion in the text that advocates the use of fungus saying that is an impossible task to accomplish because it must be applied on every frog individually on a large scale of populations, also this method doesn't prevent the other generations from being infected, so it must be applied on every generation over and over, which seems far from the reach.
Finally, the lecturer undermines the third solution in the text that said water’s use should be moderate in places close to frogs’ natural habitats by stating that it’s not the original problem, but rather Global Warming is, so any efforts to reduce water’s excessive use will be inefficacy.
In a conclusive ending, the passage and the lecture remain in disagreement regarding the effectiveness of the solutions to stop frogs populations from declining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecific reasons that prove its flaws. First and foremost, the lecturer states ...
^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...y the reading text is neither practical or realistic because farmers depend on pes...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yield compared to their competitors. Furthermore, the professor refutes the s...
^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... scale of populations, also this method doesnt prevent the other generations from bein...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, which seems far from the reach. Finally, the lecturer undermines the thi...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;s excessive use will be inefficacy. In a conclusive ending, the passage and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39662447257 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95885605872 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628691983122 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6199213592 49.2860985944 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 213.166666667 110.228320801 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 21.698381199 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06452816374 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264098558782 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131196287074 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542965617476 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136588275391 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214357341622 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 13.3589403974 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.0289183223 179% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.