The reading provides three solutions to solve a problem, which is the recently reduction in frogs' population and explains each of them. On the other hand, the professor says that non of them is practical solution and refutes each author's notions.
Initially, the reading comes with the first solution that is put some laws in order to prevent farmers from utilizing pesticide in their farm lands, which is one of the causes of the reduction of frogs' population. This chemical material have been used to secure farm lands from insects. On the contrary, the professor claims that this solution is not fair to farmers that are close to frogs habitants, because if they follow this laws, they would lose in competetive markets and produce less amounts of the crops each year.
Furthermore, the reading states that fungus is another noticeable cause of the reducing population of frogs, because thickening of the skin is its consequences and scientists could treat or prevent infection that kill the fungus with heat. In contrast, the professor accounts this notion by saying that scientist must produce indivitual treatment for each frogs, because no single treatment could solve this problem for all of the frogs together. Also, scientist must update the treatments for each generation.
Last but not the least, the reading reminds us that human spread so quickly in nearby lakes, which are the suitable habitats for frogs in order to lay leggs and if we protect the lakes we could contribute to reduction of the frogs' population. However, the professor says that lakes is not a essential problem. In fact, the real problem is global warming that causes extinction of lots of frogs species.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 27
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 79
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 80
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 70
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
Essay evaluation report
the recently reduction in frogs' population
the recent reduction in frogs' population
non of them is practical solution and refutes each author's notions.
non of them is practical and refutes each author's notions.
non of them is a/the practical solution and refutes each author's notions.
not a essential problem
not an essential problem
Sentence: On the contrary, the professor claims that this solution is not fair to farmers that are close to frogs habitants, because if they follow this laws, they would lose in competetive markets and produce less amounts of the crops each year.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and laws
Sentence: In contrast, the professor accounts this notion by saying that scientist must produce indivitual treatment for each frogs, because no single treatment could solve this problem for all of the frogs together.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to each and frogs
Sentence: On the contrary, the professor claims that this solution is not fair to farmers that are close to frogs habitants, because if they follow this laws, they would lose in competetive markets and produce less amounts of the crops each year.
Error: competetive Suggestion: competitive
Sentence: In contrast, the professor accounts this notion by saying that scientist must produce indivitual treatment for each frogs, because no single treatment could solve this problem for all of the frogs together.
Error: indivitual Suggestion: individual
Sentence: Last but not the least, the reading reminds us that human spread so quickly in nearby lakes, which are the suitable habitats for frogs in order to lay leggs and if we protect the lakes we could contribute to reduction of the frogs' population.
Error: leggs Suggestion: legs
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 280 250
No. of Characters: 1379 1200
No. of Different Words: 145 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.091 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.925 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.464 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.427 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.383 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.622 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blem, which is the recently reduction in frogs population and explains each of th...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'frog'.
Suggestion: frog
...s not fair to farmers that are close to frogs habitants, because if they follow this ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...frogs habitants, because if they follow this laws, they would lose in competetive ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun amounts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lose in competetive markets and produce less amounts of the crops each year. Furt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...another noticeable cause of the reducing population of frogs, because thickening ...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... treatment could solve this problem for all of the frogs together. Also, scientist must up...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...we could contribute to reduction of the frogs population. However, the professor says...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r, the professor says that lakes is not a essential problem. In fact, the real pr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06071428571 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54173078987 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9043211842 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.818181818 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313167924434 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114388914618 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671163338529 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183154641837 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553668687883 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.