TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems

Essay topics

In this set of materials, the reading passage offers three methods in order to solve the problem of declining frog population. But in the eyes of the lecture, none of these solutions are practical and each of them have problems.
First of all, the author believes that pesticides which farmers used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops cause severe breathing problems for frogs, and suggests that farmers should not use these chemical substances. However, the speaker refutes this method and says if farmers don't use pesticides, they may lose more crops and cannot compete with others in the market.
Moreover, the writer expresses fungus makes infection in frogs and offers several ways to treat or prevent it by antifungal medication or killing the fungus with heat. In contrast, based on the lecture, this method is not practical because performing this solution for frogs individually in large scale are very difficult. Besides, this method needs to be performed for every generation of frogs separately, which is very complicated and expensive.
Also, based on the reading passage, human activities in natural habitats make lakes and marshes disappear and cause declining in frog population, and must protect them from excessive water use and development. But, the speaker disagrees and says that global warming makes lakes and marshes to disappear not human activities.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...refutes this method and says if farmers dont use pesticides, they may lose more crop...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61084831532 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3954312072 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.555555556 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378804323735 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142182361219 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852515664849 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202298422524 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411184085324 0.0443174109184 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.