The article is about the ways that should be in concern and proposed to solve the problems of frog die and extinction. The thing that will lead to serious consequences for the ecosystems for instance the frogs protect humans by eating the insects that hold disease and the passage gives three reasons of support. However the professor refutes each points and gives an explanation.
First, the reading passage states that the government should posses a rules to prohibited the farmers form using dangerous pesticides near frog populations to keep them healthy. However, the professor refutes that solutions and says that the pesticides are very necessary for crops to maintain them from harmful insects and if pesticides are restricted that will lead to the lose of crops.
In addition, the reading passage posses that at the recent time researches have discovered many ways to prevent the dehydration effect of algae that harm the frogs skin by using anti-fungal medication or kill the algae with heat. But the professor opposes this point by claimed that such medications should be give to frogs individually and for the next generations and that is too cost.
Finally, the reading passage claimed that the frogs natural habits are threatened by human activities as they lie their eggs into water and the human use the water for draining the wetlands and it is better to protect lakes and marches from excessive water. But the professor refutes this point by explained that disappearing of water natural habits will lead to global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...passage gives three reasons of support. However the professor refutes each points and g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a rule' or simply 'rules'?
Suggestion: a rule; rules
...tates that the government should posses a rules to prohibited the farmers form using da...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...icides are restricted that will lead to the lose of crops. In addition, the reading p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to cost'?
Suggestion: to cost
...nd for the next generations and that is too cost. Finally, the reading passage claime...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10236220472 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5712127921 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0486039257 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390607103842 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149467801357 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912669184067 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231837856949 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330822295461 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.