tpo 62 integrated
The reading and the lecture are both about artificial reefs. Whereas the author of the reading claims that artificial reefs can be beneficial for both fishes and fishers and lists out three reasons for support, the lecturer believes that they can cause more problems and refutes each of the author's reasons as illustrated below.
First, according to the passage, many fishers believe that the artificial reefs can help to increase the population of some species of fishes, like red snapper fish in the Gulf of Mexico. However, the lecturer disputes this idea. He mentions that the artificial reefs may increase the population of some special fishes, but eventually will decrease the overall population of fishes in the area. He states this because these reefs can attract fishes that are living far from the area to the spot, so fishers can catch them easily, and it has nothing to do with the increase in the overall population.
Second, the author argues that the artificial reefs can improve the ability of small-scale fishers to compete with bigger ones in a way of privatizing some hidden fishing places. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this argument. He explains that hiding some big tools in the sea will impose a big safety issue on others who are not aware of the materials. For example, they can cause damage to fishing nets or ship crashes in shallow water. And if they declare the place of reefs to avoid the dangers, therefore, there will be no more advantage to help them in competition with big-scale fishers.
Third, the passage states that using some old and useless material like cars, has environmental benefits as a kind of recycling if they become clean of any hazardous material before sinking to the sea. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this statement by saying that these used materials can cause serious environmental damages even if they are chemically clean. As an example, he mentions the Asbourne reef which is made of old tires. This artificial reef, during the harsh sea, shakes a lot and loosened. Therefore these unwrapped junks move around and cause damages to nearby plants and animals in the coastline area.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e harsh sea, shakes a lot and loosened. Therefore these unwrapped junks move around and c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, for example, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98060941828 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51333106667 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2874100719 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412623704402 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125297705202 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838091436754 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246742226032 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506271108794 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e harsh sea, shakes a lot and loosened. Therefore these unwrapped junks move around and c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, for example, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98060941828 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51333106667 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2874100719 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412623704402 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125297705202 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838091436754 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246742226032 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506271108794 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.