Tpo 6
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
online encyclopedias
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on being athenthic the online encyclopedias. The penman puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that since public with various level of aknowledgement can add to the information on this reference, it can not be scientific and may include errors. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, correcting error is do able in online encyclopedias, but the printed ones'errors can not been easily revised.
The second point offered by the author is that hackers can change online information, but writted ones can not interfereed. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that reed-only format makes it possible that crucial facts be reliable. In addition, some persons's job is monitoring the accuracy of that kind of data.
Last, the reading passage suggests that various subjects about a certain matter make it confuse able source for users. However, the lecturer holds a different perspective. She explains that in printed vergen only academic elites decide what kind of knowledge be available in references, but in online one, there are great diversity of interests and this point is a big advantage.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according to above reasons.
- TPO 41Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage. making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. 88
- TPO 7It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 86
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 31 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
.... According to her, correcting error is do able in online encyclopedias, but the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, in addition, kind of, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23788546256 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79397971597 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647577092511 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2172666123 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119560113061 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366351395914 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452625273609 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586540302489 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386796621444 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.