The passage state that there are humans interests to elephants brought about many beliefs about theirs behaviors. Conversely the professor believes that these beliefs are caused by misunderstanding of elephants behaviors. She offers three counter-arguments to demonstrayte weaknesses of each presumprion about this misunderstanding.
The first paragraph asserts that elephants are aware of their death and explains that is why they break up their herd when they get old and find a place to die. In contrast, the professor thinks that this behavior is not due to their awareness of death. The lecturer thinks that the reason behind this behavior is that their teeth is not as sharp as before. Therefore, they look for softer plants which is found near water and that is the place which elephants go and die and is dubbed "elephants graveyard. This directly contradicts the first assumption made in the text.
More over, the second part of the texts mentions that,elephants have artistic feeling and are able to draw. The professor rejects this justification by suggesting that elephants are trained to do this kind of activities. She clarifies that their ears are very sensitive, and the trainers control them how to move the brush by touching their ears.
The final portion of the text talks about the beliefs that elephants fear of mics. It concludes this from a Roman philosopher and a recent research. Once again the professor rejects this theory. She emphasizes that this is result of another misinterpretation in the elephants behaviors. She explains that the real reason of the fact that elephants stay away from mice is that the mics look are unfamiliar to them. On the other hand in places that elephants see mics and understated that they are harmless they do not show this behavior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...ut many beliefs about theirs behaviors. Conversely the professor believes that these belie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... softer plants which is found near water and that is the place which elephants go...
^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , elephants
...e second part of the texts mentions that,elephants have artistic feeling and are able to d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...ludes this from a Roman philosopher and a recent research. Once again the professor rejects this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oman philosopher and a recent research. Once again the professor rejects this theory...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12203389831 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94404389011 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532203389831 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2834849591 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8823529412 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.