tpo1.1
The text and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of the four-day work policy. While the text list some factors such as the more profits for the company, better economic condition, and decrement of the unemployment rate as the benefits of this policy, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into question for the information in the reading passage and to come to her conclusion.
First of all, the professor refutes the aspect of enhancement of company profit which in the reading part is nominated as one of the advantages of this policy, since the workforce are less inclined to do the mistakes and the company has the same outcome with less error. The lecturer states that new employees require a novel cost to get prepared and illustrate their function. While the company has to spend the more money for medical benefits and insurance; besides, the novel workforces demands additional space and computers to be accountable. All of these costs cut into profits. As a result, the company does not do the profit.
Next, although the passage mentions that this policy is beneficial as it reduces the unemployment rates, the professor doubts the truth of this claim. As the lecturer asserts this policy is costly and this situation leads the employers to promote their expectation from their employees. For instance, they can ask the workforces to show the same workload in four days work which they illustrated in the five days work. Hence, they do not require a new force that is how the lecturer cast doubt on the accuracy of this aspect.
Finally, the lecturer argues that this role does not enhance the workers' leisure hours. Meanwhile, the passage mentions it as a benefit of this incidence. Based on the professor's evidence this role endangers the employees' life quality. Since they are more likely to be fired; whenever the company faces the downturn. Moreover, this group of employees does not have the same benefit option which the group of 5-days wok has.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving he 66
- 1. The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land 89
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 79
- tpo1.1 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...essors evidence this role endangers the employees life quality. Since they are more likel...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290322580645 0.261695866417 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.129032258065 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0672043010753 0.0723426182421 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0268817204301 0.0435111971325 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0268817204301 0.0277247811725 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118279569892 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.010752688172 0.0370669169778 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.53795411162 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268817204301 0.0208969081088 129% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.174731182796 0.128158765124 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00268817204301 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0161290322581 0.0114777025283 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2020.0 1645.83664459 123% => OK
No of words: 340.0 271.125827815 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94117647059 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347058823529 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291176470588 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197058823529 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108823529412 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53795411162 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 53.5812972192 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.25 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.5089864003 49.3711431718 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 50.3676470588 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.29411764706 1.90840788429 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115623497658 0.142949733639 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0935409903121 0.0787303798458 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.601031510677 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166701292362 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.605962074464 0.414875509568 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0447497130103 0.0530846634433 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.