TPO11
The authors of the reading passage argue that the decrease in reading literature is detrimental to the culture and society. The lecturer, however, refutes the arguments presented in the reading passage due to the following reasons.
First, literature is not the only intellectual genre. Books of other categories such as science and politics are also creative and, if not less, as stimulation as literature. This apparently contradicts with the reading's statement that "by reading less literature, the reading public is missing out on important benefits".
Second, novels and poems are not the only cultural materials. There are numerous perfect movies and songs which are by no means a waste of time. Here comes another contradiction with the assertion of the reading passage that the level of culture has been lowered as people have become interested in forms of entertainment other than reading.
Third, modern authors' books are difficult to understand. Even the people who were into reading literature in past would not choose to read these books. On the contrary, the reading's authors assert that the perfect novels created by talented artists are being depreciated, and hence, their chances to get published are spoiled.
To sum up, the professor believes that the arguments of the reading passage are not compelling, and the decrease in the number of literature readers does not have a negative impact on the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2022-01-10 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | shabnam_520 | 80 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | niloolin | 70 | view |
- TPO_27_Integrated writing task 85
- reducing working hours 83
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 95
- TPO 04_ Integrated task 83
- TPO 04_ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...e. This apparently contradicts with the readings statement that 'by reading less li...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35087719298 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8137665576 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574561403509 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0080549067 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403553756652 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136834760365 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963755496504 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217031383689 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776484663699 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.