The article states that because of the increase in the world population which is occurring nowadays, the number of birds will increasingly decline and provides three reasons for support. On the other hand, the professor argues that the reasons which the passage claims are not convincing and refutes each reason.
To commence with, the reading avers that as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' habitats will continue to disappear. However, the lecturer contradicts that human settlement is harmful to some types of birds but not for all of them. On the contrary, urban life provides better and larger habitats for birds. As a result, some people in the cities are complaining about the increase in some kinds of birds' population. As you can see, the story of urban life and birds' habitats won't result in a uniform decline of birds' population.
Second, the article expresses that agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. Hence, keeping this pace will result in further destruction of bird habitats. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point by stating that although the agricultural activities should increase, it won't affect the birds' habitats as it is assumed in the article. In favor of technology, humankind has introduced many new agricultural methods that will help people to cultivate more crops in smaller lands and it will harm the birds less and less in the future.
At last, the author claims that increasing the agricultural activities will lead to use more ofchemical pesticides. Nonetheless, the lecture opposes this point by declaring that the two major changes have occurred in the use of pesticides. First, people are using pesticides that have less toxic matters and also they are using pest resisting crops that don't harm birds at all.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 83
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 15 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Forest- TPO14- Salvage logging- Insects 80
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey are using pest resisting crops that dont harm birds at all.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23389830508 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72511592831 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522033898305 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8421283306 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531766457731 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176572226972 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947989475434 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288418985222 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101409249567 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.