The reading and the lecturer are both about the conservation of Torreya Taxiflora. The author of the reading passage suggests three possible ways of conservingTorreya Taxiflora tree. These possible solutions are challenged by the lecturer. He is of the opinion that proposed solutions might not result in the predicted outcomes.
First of all, the author of the reading passage states that they can be preserved in their natural habitat. In the article, it is mentioned that North Florida has a favorable climate and can be conserved trees by utilizing the specific micro-climate of North Florida. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this is unlikely to be successful because due to global warming, the temperature of North Florida is increasing and is not suitable for the growth of the Torreya Taxiflora. He additionally says that the damp and swampy areas are gradually drying up due to the effect of global warming, as a result, the North Florida region might not be the appropriate place for the conservation of the Torreya Taxiflora. Hence, it is not an appropriate measure to protect Torreya Taxiflora.
Secondly, the writer contends they can also be preserved in the new environment away from their original habitat. The article points out that seeds and sapling from North Florida can be taken to the new environmental condition favorable for the growth of the Torreya Taxiflora. This point is rebutted by the speaker. He argues that in the new environment, the Torreya Taxiflora can grow rapidly and may result in the extinction of the other endangered species. He provides an example of Black Locust. He adds that after the transfer of Black Locust in the new environment, it spread so rapidly and resulted in the extinction of many other endangered species. So, this is not a proper solution.
Thirdly, the author posits that they can be preserved in the Research center. It is useful because, in the small areas, it is easier to manage the Torreya Taxiflora and conduct research on how to conserve Torreya Taxiflora, so that the outcome of the research can be used in the conservation of the Torreya Taxiflora. In contrast, the other opinion is it is also not a good measure because, in the laboratory condition, it is hard to control disease and is small for maintaining large number of plant species.
- Rembrandt s painting 68
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms offices and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in 78
- TPO 29Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the Nort 68
- Tpo30 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...He provides an example of Black Locust. He adds that after the transfer of Black L...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 10.4613686534 249% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99489795918 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86776451313 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420918367347 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 3.25607064018 491% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3671387832 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331203290391 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995456557903 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875599771211 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203386824059 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824627219628 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.