The reader claims three benefits of the Genetically modified trees and provides reasons for supporting. On the other hand, the professor counters these specific points and presents clues to call into the information in the passage and he refuses each of the author’s ideas. The author says the Genetically modified trees are more beneficial and productive, while the professor says although there is some benefit from the trees but more costly and severe problems.
First, the reader debates that these threes are more resistant to the environment than the natural trees. Conversely, the speaker explains that even though that the native trees may not survive in the harsh environments or when they exposed to the specific types of insects. But, one of these species can resist these conditions and keep the continuation of their generation. Also, he says when the Genetically modified tree's exposure to the same conditions all of them will die out and no guarantee for their surviving.
Second, the author discusses the Genetically modified trees are faster to grow, and also their products are more yield compared to the native one. The professor disputes that by telling that the seeds of these trees are expensive when we buy and there are hidden costs such as after planting we cannot easily re panting the seed, but under the law, we have to pay for each time replanting.
Third, the author says that we do not need to destroy a lot of trees to cover the needs of the wood for the human because the new trees are more yielding and faster. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that these trees are competing with the natural one for the resources such as the soil and water because the genetically modified trees are aggressive and can damage to the local trees. So the damage exceeds the benefit
- tpo 24 74
- Do you agree or did agree with following statement successful job needs good relations with people more than studying hard? 57
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in the future job, the ability to treat well to people is more important than studying hard in the school. 63
Essay evaluation report
although there is some benefit from the trees but more costly and severe problems.
Description: don't put 'although' 'but' in one sentence.
flaws:
No. of Words: 310 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 310 250
No. of Characters: 1485 1200
No. of Different Words: 162 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.79 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.415 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.917 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.594 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.161 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trees. So the damage exceeds the benefit
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, may, second, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50425028919 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.429848511 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381900376171 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150741174531 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105809439979 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249476031807 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410696614129 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.