tpo22
The reading passage and listening are both about the pros and cons of producing ethanol fuel for using alternative to gasoline. The article strongly postulates that it is not an appropriate substitute for gasoline. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that those author's points aren't plausible because of several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that using ethanol fuel grow up global warming which is the most serious environmental issue nowadays. Furthermore, he asserts that they release a great deal of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere directly. Nonetheless, the professor in the lecture offsets these points by declaring that every plant of Earth absorb carbon dioxide for their nutritional process even it is true that ethanol sends out greenhouse gas so in general it is eliminated from the air thanks to plants basic needs.
On top of this, the professor elaborates by bringing up the point that they use cellulose which is mostly inedible plants to produce replacement source, thus it doesn't lead the animal to vanish significantly. these claims refute the author's indications about using a great amount of corn to create ethanol fuel takes away their essence food source from animals such as cows and chickens.
The text lastly insists that gasoline price are equally same as ethanol fuels in today because of the government's impose payments but if the officials stop this determination it is expected that the price of ethanol increase dramatically. The speaker in the lecture counter these implications by asserting that if the people use this alternative source instead of gasoline, the outcomes rise and it brings a reduction in its price. Moreover, people say that if it happens they price will drop out 40 percentage than before.
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- TPO20 88
- TPO24 Integrated Writing 88
- tpo27 81
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ly delineates that those authors points arent plausible because of several compelling...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... to produce replacement source, thus it doesnt lead the animal to vanish significantly...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ead the animal to vanish significantly. these claims refute the authors indications a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, in general, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22260273973 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74477915851 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0096410987 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390133228609 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132143987022 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894436291477 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222995724721 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00958189416855 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.